[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13426186#comment-13426186
 ] 

Adam Muise commented on HDFS-3475:
----------------------------------

Note on this value: while we tested at 100, this may be too high for a cluster 
under even moderate workload. The cluster in question had very powerful nodes 
and dual-bonded 10Gb interfaces. We also had to increase the DataNode memory in 
the range of 4-6Gb. You may choose to start the value at 10 and go up based on 
your available memory for the Datanode, I/O, and network capacity. 
                
> Make the replication monitor multipliers configurable
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3475
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3475
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Harsh J
>            Assignee: Harsh J
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 2.1.0-alpha
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-3475.patch, HDFS-3475.patch, HDFS-3475.patch
>
>
> BlockManager currently hardcodes the following two constants:
> {code}
> private static final int INVALIDATE_WORK_PCT_PER_ITERATION = 32;
> private static final int REPLICATION_WORK_MULTIPLIER_PER_ITERATION = 2;
> {code}
> These are used to throttle/limit the amount of deletion and 
> replication-to-other-DN work done per heartbeat interval of a live DN.
> Not many have had reasons to want these changed so far but there have been a 
> few requests I've faced over the past year from a variety of clusters I've 
> helped maintain. I think with the improvements in disks and network thats 
> already started to be rolled out in production environments out there, 
> changing these may start making sense to some.
> Lets at least make it advanced-configurable with proper docs that warn 
> adequately, with the defaults being what they are today. With hardcodes, it 
> comes down to a recompile for admins, which is not something they may like.
> Please let me know your thoughts.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to