[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453469#comment-13453469 ]
Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-2631: -------------------------------------------- Yeah. The goal should be to have a fuse_dfs binary that can work with either libwebhdfs.so or libhdfs.so. The interfaces are exactly the same and there should be no need for recompilation. > Rewrite fuse-dfs to use libwebhdfs > ---------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-2631 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2631 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: webhdfs > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Jing Zhao > Attachments: HDFS-2631.1.patch, HDFS-2631.patch > > > We should port the implementation of fuse-dfs to use the webhdfs protocol. > This has a number of benefits: > * Compatibility - allows a single fuse client to work across server versions > * Works with both WebHDFS and Hoop since they are protocol compatible > * Removes the overhead related to libhdfs (forking a jvm) > * Makes it easier to support features like security -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira