[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13481545#comment-13481545
 ] 

Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-4090:
------------------------------------

The only nit (and I don't care if you don't fix it), is that the comments could 
have taken 2 lines instead of 3.
Also, when I removed the src/main part of the patch, the test fails with a NPE 
because zeroChecksum == null. Maybe check for null? But I'm not going to be a 
stickler for that either.

Please feel free to check it in. +1 lgtm
                
> getFileChecksum() result incompatible when called against zero-byte files.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-4090
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4090
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: hdfs client
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.4, 2.0.2-alpha
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kihwal Lee
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: hdfs-4090.patch
>
>
> When getFileChecksum() is called against a zero-byte file, the branch-1 
> client returns MD5MD5CRC32FileChecksum with crcPerBlock=0, bytePerCrc=0 and 
> md5=70bc8f4b72a86921468bf8e8441dce51, whereas a null is returned in trunk.
> The null makes sense since there is no actual block checksums, but this 
> breaks the compatibility when doing distCp and calling getFileChecksum() via 
> webhdfs or hftp.
> This JIRA is to make the client to return the same 'magic' value that the 
> branch-1 and earlier clients return.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to