[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13493644#comment-13493644 ]
Binglin Chang commented on HDFS-4165: ------------------------------------- Thanks Suresh and Brandon for review. @Eli Given the current constant value, the current sanity check can't fail {code} public static final long QUOTA_DONT_SET = Long.MAX_VALUE; public static final long QUOTA_RESET = -1L; {code} HDFS-46 also reminds me that Long.MAX_VALUE is used both for QUOTA_DONT_SET and the default namespace quota of root directory, so you can't set quota to Long.MAX_VALUE for root directory using RPC, a better value for QUOTA_DONT_SET should be -2 instead. > Faulty sanity check in FsDirectory.unprotectedSetQuota > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HDFS-4165 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4165 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: name-node > Affects Versions: 3.0.0 > Reporter: Binglin Chang > Assignee: Binglin Chang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-4165.patch > > > According to the documentation: > The quota can have three types of values : (1) 0 or more will set > the quota to that value, (2) {@link HdfsConstants#QUOTA_DONT_SET} implies > the quota will not be changed, and (3) {@link HdfsConstants#QUOTA_RESET} > implies the quota will be reset. Any other value is a runtime error. > sanity check in FsDirectory.unprotectedSetQuota should use > {code} > nsQuota != HdfsConstants.QUOTA_RESET > {code} > rather than > {code} > nsQuota < HdfsConstants.QUOTA_RESET > {code} > Since HdfsConstants.QUOTA_RESET is defined to be -1, there is not any problem > for this code, but it is better to do it right. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira