[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aaron T. Myers updated HDFS-4462:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: HDFS-4462.patch

Here's a patch which addresses the issue by only comparing the namespace IDs to 
determine if this is the same NN/2NN pair, instead of the NS IDs and BP 
IDs/Cluster IDs. NS IDs predate federation so this allows upgrades from 
pre-federation versions of HDFS. This patch also makes sure that we definitely 
reload the downloaded fsimage from disk in the case that we've identified that 
the 2NN's metadata does not match the layout version of the NN's.
                
> 2NN will fail to checkpoint after an HDFS upgrade from a pre-federation 
> version of HDFS
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-4462
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4462
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.2-alpha
>            Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
>            Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
>         Attachments: HDFS-4462.patch
>
>
> The 2NN currently has logic to detect when its on-disk FS metadata needs an 
> upgrade with respect to the NN's metadata (i.e. the layout versions are 
> different) and in this case it will proceed with the checkpoint despite 
> storage signatures not matching precisely if the BP ID and Cluster ID do 
> match exactly. However, in situations where we're upgrading from versions of 
> HDFS prior to federation, which had no BP IDs or Cluster IDs, checkpoints 
> will always fail with an error like the following:
> {noformat}
> 13/01/31 17:02:25 ERROR namenode.SecondaryNameNode: checkpoint: Inconsistent 
> checkpoint fields.
> LV = -40 namespaceID = 403832480 cTime = 1359680537192 ; clusterId = 
> CID-0df6ff22-1165-4c7d-9630-429972a7737c ; blockpoolId = 
> BP-1520616013-172.21.3.106-1359680537136.
> Expecting respectively: -19; 403832480; 0; ; .
> {noformat}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to