[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13577326#comment-13577326
 ] 

Harsh J commented on HDFS-4461:
-------------------------------

A general memory increase between 1.0 -> 2.0 can also be attributed to the use 
of the lengthy block pool ID bytes in the file paths? Minor regression, but 
very clearly present from my experience.
                
> DirectoryScanner: volume path prefix takes up memory for every block that is 
> scanned 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-4461
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4461
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.3-alpha
>            Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe
>            Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HDFS-4461.002.patch, HDFS-4461.003.patch, 
> memory-analysis.png
>
>
> In the {{DirectoryScanner}}, we create a class {{ScanInfo}} for every block.  
> This object contains two File objects-- one for the metadata file, and one 
> for the block file.  Since those File objects contain full paths, users who 
> pick a lengthly path for their volume roots will end up using an extra 
> N_blocks * path_prefix bytes per block scanned.  We also don't really need to 
> store File objects-- storing strings and then creating File objects as needed 
> would be cheaper.  This would be a nice efficiency improvement.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to