[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13628191#comment-13628191
]
Suresh Srinivas commented on HDFS-4305:
---------------------------------------
bq. I don't think it's in the best interest of the project if the setup
instructions involve changing a bunch of things away from unsafe defaults.
Fair point.
bq. Similarly, waiting until after a production incident to make the user then
go and learn about a better default is not very user-centric.
How many incidents of this nature you have observed so far?
> Add a configurable limit on number of blocks per file, and min block size
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-4305
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4305
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
> Affects Versions: 1.0.4, 3.0.0, 2.0.2-alpha
> Reporter: Todd Lipcon
> Assignee: Andrew Wang
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: hdfs-4305-1.patch
>
>
> We recently had an issue where a user set the block size very very low and
> managed to create a single file with hundreds of thousands of blocks. This
> caused problems with the edit log since the OP_ADD op was so large
> (HDFS-4304). I imagine it could also cause efficiency issues in the NN. To
> prevent users from making such mistakes, we should:
> - introduce a configurable minimum block size, below which requests are
> rejected
> - introduce a configurable maximum number of blocks per file, above which
> requests to add another block are rejected (with a suitably high default as
> to not prevent legitimate large files)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
