[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13770209#comment-13770209 ]
Chuan Liu commented on HDFS-4320: --------------------------------- We need to reopen this JIRA for 2.0/trunk code base. I think the original trunk patch did have some problems. We should use the existing key "dfs.namenode.rpc-address" instead of creating the new key "dfs.namenode.address". > Add a separate configuration for namenode rpc address instead of only using > fs.default.name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-4320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4320 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: datanode, namenode > Affects Versions: 1.1.0 > Reporter: Mostafa Elhemali > Assignee: Mostafa Elhemali > Fix For: 1.2.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-4320.branch-1.2.patch, HDFS-4320.branch-1.3.patch, > HDFS-4320.patch, HDFS-4320.trunk.2.patch, HDFS-4320.trunk.patch > > > When NameNode starts up, it tries to find out its address by looking at the > fs.default.name configuration key instead of using its own keys. This breaks > scenarios where we try to configure a Hadoop cluster that uses a different > default file system than DFS, but still try to prop up namenode and datanode > services as a secondary file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira