[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13848046#comment-13848046
 ] 

Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-5434:
--------------------------------------------

I sort of assumed when I read this JIRA that Eric was considering situations 
where the admin "knows" that the storage is reliable despite having only one 
replica.  For example, if there is RAID and we trust it, or if the backend 
storage system which the DataNode is using is doing replication underneath 
HDFS.  This is definitely a little bit outside the normal Hadoop use-case, but 
it's something we can support without too much difficulty with a client-side 
config.

> Write resiliency for replica count 1
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-5434
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5434
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Buddy
>            Priority: Minor
>
> If a file has a replica count of one, the HDFS client is exposed to write 
> failures if the data node fails during a write. With a pipeline of size of 
> one, no recovery is possible if the sole data node dies.
> A simple fix is to force a minimum pipeline size of 2, while leaving the 
> replication count as 1. The implementation for this is fairly non-invasive.
> Although the replica count is one, the block will be written to two data 
> nodes instead of one. If one of the data nodes fails during the write, normal 
> pipeline recovery will ensure that the write succeeds to the surviving data 
> node.
> The existing code in the name node will prune the extra replica when it 
> receives the block received reports for the finalized block from both data 
> nodes. This results in the intended replica count of one for the block.
> This behavior should be controlled by a configuration option such as 
> {{dfs.namenode.minPipelineSize}}.
> This behavior can be implemented in {{FSNameSystem.getAdditionalBlock()}} by 
> ensuring that the pipeline size passed to 
> {{BlockPlacementPolicy.chooseTarget()}} in the replication parameter is:
> {code}
> max(replication, ${dfs.namenode.minPipelineSize})
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

Reply via email to