[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Harsh J reassigned HDFS-5189:
-----------------------------

    Assignee:     (was: Harsh J)

> Rename the "CorruptBlocks" metric to "CorruptReplicas"
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-5189
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5189
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0-beta
>            Reporter: Harsh J
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The NameNode increments a "CorruptBlocks" metric even if only one of the 
> block's
> replicas is reported corrupt (genuine checksum fail, or even if a
> replica has a bad genstamp). In cases where this is incremented, fsck
> still reports a healthy state.
> This is confusing to users and causes false alarm as they feel this is to be 
> monitored (instead of MissingBlocks). The metric is truly trying to report 
> only corrupt replicas, not whole blocks, and ought to be renamed.
> FWIW, the "dfsadmin -report" reports a proper string of "Blocks with corrupt 
> replicas:" when printing this count.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to