[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13876668#comment-13876668
]
Yongjun Zhang commented on HDFS-5767:
-------------------------------------
Hi [~brandonli],
About the example you provided (user "hadoop" with id 123...), I assume you
meant when we issue command "getent passwd hadoop", it will return the first
match found for user "hadoop" based on the search order configured in
nsswtich.conf.
But I would expect "getent passwd" (no user specified at command line) will
still return two entries for user "hadoop" based on the spec of getent:
"
The getent command displays entries from databases supported by the Name
Service Switch libraries, which are configured
in /etc/nsswitch.conf. If one or more key arguments are provided, then
only the entries that match the supplied keys will be
displayed. Otherwise, if no key is provided, all entries will be
displayed (unless the database does not support enumeration).
"
May I know whether you meant
A. if nsswitch.conf is set up correctly, then "getent passwd" should return
unique mapping of all users?
or
B. duplicate enries should be physically removed from the databases (used by
nsswitch.conf), so "getent passwd" has no chance to return multiple entries for
the same user?
Thanks.
> Nfs implementation assumes userName userId mapping to be unique, which is not
> true sometimes
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-5767
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5767
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: nfs
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0
> Environment: With LDAP enabled
> Reporter: Yongjun Zhang
> Assignee: Brandon Li
>
> I'm seeing that the nfs implementation assumes unique <userName, userId> pair
> to be returned by command "getent paswd". That is, for a given userName,
> there should be a single userId, and for a given userId, there should be a
> single userName. The reason is explained in the following message:
> private static final String DUPLICATE_NAME_ID_DEBUG_INFO = "NFS gateway
> can't start with duplicate name or id on the host system.\n"
> + "This is because HDFS (non-kerberos cluster) uses name as the only
> way to identify a user or group.\n"
> + "The host system with duplicated user/group name or id might work
> fine most of the time by itself.\n"
> + "However when NFS gateway talks to HDFS, HDFS accepts only user and
> group name.\n"
> + "Therefore, same name means the same user or same group. To find the
> duplicated names/ids, one can do:\n"
> + "<getent passwd | cut -d: -f1,3> and <getent group | cut -d: -f1,3>
> on Linux systms,\n"
> + "<dscl . -list /Users UniqueID> and <dscl . -list /Groups
> PrimaryGroupID> on MacOS.";
> This requirement can not be met sometimes (e.g. because of the use of LDAP)
> Let's do some examination:
> What exist in /etc/passwd:
> $ more /etc/passwd | grep ^bin
> bin:x:2:2:bin:/bin:/bin/sh
> $ more /etc/passwd | grep ^daemon
> daemon:x:1:1:daemon:/usr/sbin:/bin/sh
> The above result says userName "bin" has userId "2", and "daemon" has userId
> "1".
>
> What we can see with "getent passwd" command due to LDAP:
> $ getent passwd | grep ^bin
> bin:x:2:2:bin:/bin:/bin/sh
> bin:x:1:1:bin:/bin:/sbin/nologin
> $ getent passwd | grep ^daemon
> daemon:x:1:1:daemon:/usr/sbin:/bin/sh
> daemon:x:2:2:daemon:/sbin:/sbin/nologin
> We can see that there are multiple entries for the same userName with
> different userIds, and the same userId could be associated with different
> userNames.
> So the assumption stated in the above DEBUG_INFO message can not be met here.
> The DEBUG_INFO also stated that HDFS uses name as the only way to identify
> user/group. I'm filing this JIRA for a solution.
> Hi [~brandonli], since you implemented most of the nfs feature, would you
> please comment?
> Thanks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
