[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13883443#comment-13883443 ]
Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-5781: -------------------------------------------- Yeah, perhaps we could have a separate JIRA to use a static function rather than a static block. > Use an array to record the mapping between FSEditLogOpCode and the > corresponding byte value > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-5781 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5781 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: namenode > Affects Versions: 2.4.0 > Reporter: Jing Zhao > Assignee: Jing Zhao > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.4.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-5781.000.patch, HDFS-5781.001.patch, > HDFS-5781.002.patch, HDFS-5781.002.patch > > > HDFS-5674 uses Enum.values and enum.ordinal to identify an editlog op for a > given byte value. While improving the efficiency, it may cause issue. E.g., > when several new editlog ops are added to trunk around the same time (for > several different new features), it is hard to backport the editlog ops with > larger byte values to branch-2 before those with smaller values, since there > will be gaps in the byte values of the enum. > This jira plans to still use an array to record the mapping between editlog > ops and their byte values, and allow gap between valid ops. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)