[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Eric Sirianni updated HDFS-5318:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: HDFS-5318-trunk-c.patch

Updated patch with fix for {{TestBalancerWithNodeGroup}}.

> Support read-only and read-write paths to shared replicas
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-5318
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5318
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Eric Sirianni
>         Attachments: HDFS-5318-trunk-c.patch, HDFS-5318-trunk.patch, 
> HDFS-5318-trunkb.patch, HDFS-5318.patch, HDFS-5318a-branch-2.patch, 
> HDFS-5318b-branch-2.patch, HDFS-5318c-branch-2.patch, hdfs-5318.pdf
>
>
> There are several use cases for using shared-storage for datanode block 
> storage in an HDFS environment (storing cold blocks on a NAS device, Amazon 
> S3, etc.).
> With shared-storage, there is a distinction between:
> # a distinct physical copy of a block
> # an access-path to that block via a datanode.  
> A single 'replication count' metric cannot accurately capture both aspects.  
> However, for most of the current uses of 'replication count' in the Namenode, 
> the "number of physical copies" aspect seems to be the appropriate semantic.
> I propose altering the replication counting algorithm in the Namenode to 
> accurately infer distinct physical copies in a shared storage environment.  
> With HDFS-5115, a {{StorageID}} is a UUID.  I propose associating some minor 
> additional semantics to the {{StorageID}} - namely that multiple datanodes 
> attaching to the same physical shared storage pool should report the same 
> {{StorageID}} for that pool.  A minor modification would be required in the 
> DataNode to enable the generation of {{StorageID}} s to be pluggable behind 
> the {{FsDatasetSpi}} interface.  
> With those semantics in place, the number of physical copies of a block in a 
> shared storage environment can be calculated as the number of _distinct_ 
> {{StorageID}} s associated with that block.
> Consider the following combinations for two {{(DataNode ID, Storage ID)}} 
> pairs {{(DN_A, S_A) (DN_B, S_B)}} for a given block B:
> * {{DN_A != DN_B && S_A != S_B}} - *different* access paths to *different* 
> physical replicas (i.e. the traditional HDFS case with local disks)
> ** → Block B has {{ReplicationCount == 2}}
> * {{DN_A != DN_B && S_A == S_B}} - *different* access paths to the *same* 
> physical replica (e.g. HDFS datanodes mounting the same NAS share)
> ** → Block B has {{ReplicationCount == 1}}
> For example, if block B has the following location tuples:
> * {{DN_1, STORAGE_A}}
> * {{DN_2, STORAGE_A}}
> * {{DN_3, STORAGE_B}}
> * {{DN_4, STORAGE_B}},
> the effect of this proposed change would be to calculate the replication 
> factor in the namenode as *2* instead of *4*.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to