[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Suresh Srinivas updated HDFS-6005:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: HDFS-6005.02.patch

Minor update to the patch to remove unnecessary casts.

> Simplify Datanode rollback and downgrade
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6005
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6005
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: datanode, namenode
>            Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
>            Assignee: Suresh Srinivas
>         Attachments: HDFS-6005.01.patch, HDFS-6005.02.patch, HDFS-6005.patch
>
>
> Problem:
> When rolling upgrade fails, the cluster can either be downgraded or rolled 
> back. With the current functionality in this feature branch, it is possible 
> to downgrade namenode, while datanode is incorrectly rolled back. This does 
> not affect the cluster state. The old blocks that appear back on the datanode 
> due to rollback will be deleted. Similarly it is also possible to rollback 
> namenode, while datanode is not rolled back. This can cause problem where old 
> blocks do not appear back on the datanode and can result in missing blocks.
> Solution:
> I propose making the following changes:
> During rollback or downgrade, the entire cluster must be restarted. The 
> datanodes always restore the deleted blocks on restart and go back to trash 
> disabled mode. There is no need for datanodes to be started up 
> -rollingUpgrade -rollback, anymore.
> # On namenode downgrade, the restored blocks are deleted.
> # On namenode rollback, the restored blocks will be retained and any newly 
> created blocks (since the start of rolling upgrade) are deleted.
> This is much simpler operationally and solves the problem described above.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to