[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13921622#comment-13921622
]
Suresh Srinivas commented on HDFS-6057:
---------------------------------------
[~cmccabe], some of the recent changes related to short circuits related work
have caused few bugs. This has impacted some of the testing that we are doing
in terms of stabilization. I have few questions:
# Does this need to go into release 2.4? I think currently 2.4 should either
get changes related to previous feature we talked about, blocker bugs or any
code changes (that involves refactoring) that makes future code merges harder.
# Can you please share the plan of what other work you are planning that will
make it into 2.4?
> DomainSocketWatcher.watcherThread should be marked as daemon thread
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6057
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: hdfs-client
> Affects Versions: 2.4.0
> Reporter: Eric Sirianni
> Assignee: Ted Yu
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: hdfs-6057-v1.txt
>
>
> Running the tip of {{branch-2.4}}, I'm observing some zombie processes in my
> environment. jstack shows the following thread preventing the JVM from
> shutting down:
> {noformat}
> "Thread-3" prio=10 tid=0x00007f0a908a5800 nid=0x3ee9 runnable
> [0x00007f0a89471000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> at org.apache.hadoop.net.unix.DomainSocketWatcher.doPoll0(Native Method)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.net.unix.DomainSocketWatcher.access$800(DomainSocketWatcher.java:52)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.net.unix.DomainSocketWatcher$1.run(DomainSocketWatcher.java:455)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
> {noformat}
> Marking the {{DomainSocketWatcher.watcherThread}} as a daemon thread would
> prevent this situation. Is there any reason it isn't classified as such?
> Also, tracing through the code, I don't see any code path where
> {{DomainSocketWatcher.close()}} is invoked (though this would seem to be a
> larger issue -- maybe I'm missing something...).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
