[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976331#comment-13976331 ]
Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-6267: ----------------------------------- Hey [~azuryy]! Thanks for putting in the work here, but unfortunately you've stepped into a very touchy subject :) If you look on common-dev, there was a big thread about updating for JDK7, and Jetty is related to that. The consensus was that we can't do this in branch-2 at least because of compatibility concerns unless we shade our internal dependencies. It'd be technically fine to do this in trunk for 3.0 (like this JIRA's affects version indicates), but I personally am against divergence between trunk and branch-2 until there's a clear plan for releasing a Hadoop 3.0. Other developers also feel this way. This is also a change that would need a lot of testing, since Jetty is used in a lot of places in Hadoop. > Upgrade Jetty6 to Jetty9 > ------------------------ > > Key: HDFS-6267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6267 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: datanode, namenode > Affects Versions: 3.0.0 > Reporter: Fengdong Yu > Assignee: Fengdong Yu > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-6267.patch > > > Jetty stable version is 9.x, but it requires Java7, so I want to target 3.0 > for this upgrade. > Jetty9 is incompatible with Jetty6, so the patch will be big. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)