[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13976331#comment-13976331
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-6267:
-----------------------------------

Hey [~azuryy]! Thanks for putting in the work here, but unfortunately you've 
stepped into a very touchy subject :)

If you look on common-dev, there was a big thread about updating for JDK7, and 
Jetty is related to that. The consensus was that we can't do this in branch-2 
at least because of compatibility concerns unless we shade our internal 
dependencies. It'd be technically fine to do this in trunk for 3.0 (like this 
JIRA's affects version indicates), but I personally am against divergence 
between trunk and branch-2 until there's a clear plan for releasing a Hadoop 
3.0. Other developers also feel this way.

This is also a change that would need a lot of testing, since Jetty is used in 
a lot of places in Hadoop.

> Upgrade Jetty6 to Jetty9
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6267
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6267
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: datanode, namenode
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Fengdong Yu
>            Assignee: Fengdong Yu
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HDFS-6267.patch
>
>
> Jetty stable version is 9.x, but it requires Java7, so I want to target 3.0 
> for this upgrade.
> Jetty9 is incompatible with Jetty6, so the patch will be big.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to