[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13998419#comment-13998419
 ] 

Binglin Chang commented on HDFS-6250:
-------------------------------------

The problem with adding an datanode on both rack0 and rack1 is that, you can't 
verify there is no block movement cross rack by checking datanode dfs usage. 
some block may move from rack0 to rack1, and some may move from rack1 to rack0, 
after this, the total rack usage may not change. 


> TestBalancerWithNodeGroup.testBalancerWithRackLocality fails
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6250
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6250
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Chen He
>         Attachments: HDFS-6250-v2.patch, HDFS-6250-v3.patch, HDFS-6250.patch, 
> test_log.txt
>
>
> It was seen in https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/6669/
> {panel}
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1800> but was:<1810>
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
>       at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:147)
>       at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancerWithNodeGroup
>  .testBalancerWithRackLocality(TestBalancerWithNodeGroup.java:253)
> {panel}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to