[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14063283#comment-14063283
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6478:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12655993/HDFS-6478-3.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 2 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:

                  org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.tools.TestDFSAdminWithHA
                  
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestPipelinesFailover

    {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/7356//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/7356//console

This message is automatically generated.

> RemoteException can't be retried properly for non-HA scenario
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6478
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6478
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ming Ma
>            Assignee: Ming Ma
>         Attachments: HDFS-6478-2.patch, HDFS-6478-3.patch, HDFS-6478.patch
>
>
> For HA case, the call stack is DFSClient -> RetryInvocationHandler -> 
> ClientNamenodeProtocolTranslatorPB -> ProtobufRpcEngine. ProtobufRpcEngine. 
> ProtobufRpcEngine throws ServiceException and expects the caller to unwrap 
> it; ClientNamenodeProtocolTranslatorPB is the component that takes care of 
> that.
> {noformat}
>         at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call
>         at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.ProtobufRpcEngine$Invoker.invoke
>         at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy26.getFileInfo
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocolPB.ClientNamenodeProtocolTranslatorPB.getFileInfo
>         at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor24.invoke
>         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke
>         at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod
>         at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke
>         at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy27.getFileInfo
>         at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.getFileInfo
>         at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.getFileStatus
> {noformat}
> However, for non-HA case, the call stack is DFSClient -> 
> ClientNamenodeProtocolTranslatorPB -> RetryInvocationHandler -> 
> ProtobufRpcEngine. RetryInvocationHandler gets ServiceException and can't be 
> retried properly.
> {noformat}
> at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call
> at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.ProtobufRpcEngine$Invoker.invoke
> at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy9.getListing
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke
> at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod
> at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke
> at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy9.getListing
> at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocolPB.ClientNamenodeProtocolTranslatorPB.getListing
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.listPaths
> {noformat}
> Perhaps, we can fix it by have NN wrap RetryInvocationHandler around 
> ClientNamenodeProtocolTranslatorPB and other PBs, instead of the current wrap 
> order.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to