[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14087939#comment-14087939 ]
Brandon Li commented on HDFS-6717: ---------------------------------- I agree that the doc fixes don't have to go in 2.5. Thanks! > Jira HDFS-5804 breaks default nfs-gateway behavior for unsecured config > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-6717 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6717 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nfs > Affects Versions: 2.4.0 > Reporter: Jeff Hansen > Assignee: Brandon Li > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.6.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-6717.001.patch, HDFS-6717.more-change.patch, > HDFS-6717.more-change2.patch, HDFS-6717.more-change3.patch, > HdfsNfsGateway.html > > > I believe this is just a matter of needing to update documentation. As a > result of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5804, the secure and > unsecure code paths appear to have been merged -- this is great because it > means less code to test. However, it means that the default unsecure behavior > requires additional configuration that needs to be documented. > I'm not the first to have trouble following the instructions documented in > http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.4.0/hadoop-project-dist/hadoop-hdfs/HdfsNfsGateway.html > I kept hitting a RemoteException with the message that hdfs user cannot > impersonate root -- apparently under the old code, there was no impersonation > going on, so the nfs3 service could and should be run under the same user id > that runs hadoop (I assumed this meant the user id "hdfs"). However, with the > new unified code path, that would require hdfs to be able to impersonate root > (because root is always the local user that mounts a drive). The comments in > jira hdfs-5804 seem to indicate nobody has a problem with requiring the > nfsserver user to impersonate root -- if that means it's necessary for the > configuration to include root as a user nfsserver can impersonate, that > should be included in the setup instructions. > More to the point, it appears to be absolutely necessary now to provision a > user named "nfsserver" in order to be able to give that nfsserver ability to > impersonate other users. Alternatively I think we'd need to configure hdfs to > be able to proxy other users. I'm not really sure what the best practice > should be, but it should be documented since it wasn't needed in the past. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)