[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14093276#comment-14093276
 ] 

Haohui Mai commented on HDFS-6757:
----------------------------------

Thanks [~cmccabe] and [~daryn] for the comments.

Just to make sure that I don't accidentally miss anything, can you guys list 
the issues I need to address in the next patch? So far I plan to change the 
code so that the NN bails out when it fails to replay the OP_CLOSE operations? 
[~cmccabe], do you have anything specific that you want to address?

> Simplify lease manager with INodeID
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6757
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6757
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Haohui Mai
>            Assignee: Haohui Mai
>         Attachments: HDFS-6757.000.patch, HDFS-6757.001.patch, 
> HDFS-6757.002.patch, HDFS-6757.003.patch, HDFS-6757.004.patch
>
>
> Currently the lease manager records leases based on path instead of inode 
> ids. Therefore, the lease manager needs to carefully keep track of the path 
> of active leases during renames and deletes. This can be a non-trivial task.
> This jira proposes to simplify the logic by tracking leases using inodeids 
> instead of paths.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to