[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14098430#comment-14098430
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6800:
---------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12662015/HDFS-6800.3.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestPipelinesFailover
The following test timeouts occurred in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestValidateConfigurationSettings
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestStandbyCheckpoints
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestDelegationTokensWithHA
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestHAStateTransitions
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestHAMetrics
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestHDFSServerPorts
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/7641//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/7641//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Determine how Datanode layout changes should interact with rolling upgrade
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6800
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6800
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: datanode
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe
> Assignee: James Thomas
> Attachments: HDFS-6800.2.patch, HDFS-6800.3.patch, HDFS-6800.patch
>
>
> We need to handle attempts to rolling-upgrade the DataNode to a new storage
> directory layout.
> One approach is to disallow such upgrades. If we choose this approach, we
> should make sure that the system administrator gets a helpful error message
> and a clean failure when trying to use rolling upgrade to a version that
> doesn't support it. Based on the compatibility guarantees described in
> HDFS-5535, this would mean that *any* future DataNode layout changes would
> require a major version upgrade.
> Another approach would be to support rolling upgrade from an old DN storage
> layout to a new layout. This approach requires us to change our
> documentation to explain to users that they should supply the {{\-rollback}}
> command on the command-line when re-starting the DataNodes during rolling
> rollback. Currently the documentation just says to restart the DataNode
> normally.
> Another issue here is that the DataNode's usage message describes rollback
> options that no longer exist. The help text says that the DN supports
> {{\-rollingupgrade rollback}}, but this option was removed by HDFS-6005.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
