[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14110036#comment-14110036
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6376:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12664225/HDFS-6376.010.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:

                  
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancerWithSaslDataTransfer
                  org.apache.hadoop.security.TestRefreshUserMappings
                  
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestPipelinesFailover
                  org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestBlockPoolManager

    {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/7755//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/7755//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Distcp data between two HA clusters requires another configuration
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6376
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6376
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: datanode, federation, hdfs-client
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.4.0
>         Environment: Hadoop 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Dave Marion
>            Assignee: Dave Marion
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-6376-2.patch, HDFS-6376-3-branch-2.4.patch, 
> HDFS-6376-4-branch-2.4.patch, HDFS-6376-5-trunk.patch, 
> HDFS-6376-6-trunk.patch, HDFS-6376-7-trunk.patch, HDFS-6376-branch-2.4.patch, 
> HDFS-6376-patch-1.patch, HDFS-6376.000.patch, HDFS-6376.008.patch, 
> HDFS-6376.009.patch, HDFS-6376.010.patch
>
>
> User has to create a third set of configuration files for distcp when 
> transferring data between two HA clusters.
> Consider the scenario in [1]. You cannot put all of the required properties 
> in core-site.xml and hdfs-site.xml for the client to resolve the location of 
> both active namenodes. If you do, then the datanodes from cluster A may join 
> cluster B. I can not find a configuration option that tells the datanodes to 
> federate blocks for only one of the clusters in the configuration.
> [1] 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-user/201404.mbox/%3CBAY172-W2133964E0C283968C161DD1520%40phx.gbl%3E



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to