[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14125940#comment-14125940
 ] 

Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-6967:
-------------------------------------

I was assuming that the impact of the Jetty queue largely dominates over the 
impact of any other objects, based on my reading of the Jetty 6 
{{QueuedThreadPool}} code.  Of course, you know best what you're seeing in 
practice from {{jmap}} output (or whatever).  Overall, your proposal sounds 
good to me.

> DNs may OOM under high webhdfs load
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6967
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6967
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: datanode, webhdfs
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha, 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Daryn Sharp
>            Assignee: Eric Payne
>
> Webhdfs uses jetty.  The size of the request thread pool is limited, but 
> jetty will accept and queue infinite connections.  Every queued connection is 
> "heavy" with buffers, etc.  Unlike data streamer connections, thousands of 
> webhdfs connections will quickly OOM a DN.  The accepted requests must be 
> bounded and excess clients rejected so they retry on a new DN.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to