[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14142175#comment-14142175
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-7104:
-----------------------------------

[~jingzhao] can you provide any insight to this behavior? Zhe's comments 
basically make sense to me (i.e. make the INodesInPath#getINodes getter just a 
getter, trim the nulls from .snapshot off immediately), but a second opinion 
would be great. We already have ways of knowing if an IIP refers to a snapshot, 
so I don't think the extra nulls add much information.

> Fix and clarify INodeInPath getter functions
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7104
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7104
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Zhe Zhang
>            Assignee: Zhe Zhang
>            Priority: Minor
>
> inodes is initialized with the number of patch components. After resolve, it 
> contains both non-null and null elements (introduced by dot-snapshot dirs).
> When getINodes is called, an array is returned excluding all non elements, 
> which is the correct behavior. Meanwhile, the inodes array is trimmed too, 
> which shouldn't be done by a getter.
> Because of the above, the behavior of getINodesInPath depends on whether 
> getINodes has been called, which is not correct.
> The name of getLastINodeInPath is confusing – it actually returns the last 
> non-null inode in the path. Also, shouldn't the return type be a single INode?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to