[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14143050#comment-14143050 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6995: --------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12670371/HDFS-6995-005.patch against trunk revision 9721e2c. {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test files. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages. {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancer org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestEncryptionZonesWithKMS org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestPipelinesFailover {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/8141//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/8141//console This message is automatically generated. > Block should be placed in the client's 'rack-local' node if 'client-local' > node is not available > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HDFS-6995 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6995 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: namenode > Affects Versions: 2.5.0 > Reporter: Vinayakumar B > Assignee: Vinayakumar B > Attachments: HDFS-6995-001.patch, HDFS-6995-002.patch, > HDFS-6995-003.patch, HDFS-6995-004.patch, HDFS-6995-005.patch > > > HDFS cluster is rack aware. > Client is in different node than of datanode, > but Same rack contains one or more datanodes. > In this case first preference should be given to select 'rack-local' node. > Currently, since no Node in clusterMap corresponds to client's location, > blockplacement policy choosing a *random* node as local node and proceeding > for further placements. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)