[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14166963#comment-14166963
 ] 

Hudson commented on HDFS-7217:
------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #1922 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/1922/])
HDFS-7217. Better batching of IBRs. Contributed by Kihwal Lee. (kihwal: rev 
db71bb54bcc75b71c5841b25ceb03fb0218c6d4f)
* hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/CHANGES.txt
* 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/TestIncrementalBlockReports.java
* 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/BPOfferService.java
* 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/BPServiceActor.java


> Better batching of IBRs
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7217
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7217
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kihwal Lee
>             Fix For: 2.6.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-7217.patch
>
>
> After HDFS-2691 (pipeline recovery in HA), the number of IBR(incremental 
> block report)s have doubled.  Since processing of IBR requires exclusive 
> FSNamesystem write lock, this can be a source of significant overhead on 
> clusters with high write load.  
> On one of the busy clusters, we have observed 60 to 70 percent of available 
> handlers being constantly occupied by IBRs. This degrades throughput greatly 
> when compared to 0.23.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to