Ok, so I wrote a MapReduce job to merge the files and it appears to be working
with a limited input set.
Thanks again, BTW.
However, if I increase the amount of input data I start getting the following
types of errors:
org.apache.hadoop.util.DiskChecker$DiskErrorException: Could not find any valid
local directory for output/file.out/file.out
or
org.apache.hadoop.util.DiskChecker$DiskErrorException: Could not find any valid
local directory for output/map_0.out
Are there any logs I should be looking at to determine the exact cause of these
errors?
Are there any settings I could/should be increasing?
Note that in order to avoid unnecessary sorting overhead, I made each key a
constant (1L) so that the logs are combined but ordering isn't necessarily
preserved.
i.e.
public static class AvroReachMapper extends
AvroMapper<DeliveryLogEvent, Pair<Long, DeliveryLogEvent>> {
public void map(DeliveryLogEvent levent,
AvroCollector<Pair<Long, DeliveryLogEvent>> collector, Reporter reporter)
throws IOException {
collector.collect(new Pair<Long, DeliveryLogEvent>(1L,
levent));
}
}
public static class Reduce extends AvroReducer<Long, DeliveryLogEvent,
DeliveryLogEvent> {
@Override
public void reduce(Long key, Iterable<DeliveryLogEvent> values,
AvroCollector<DeliveryLogEvent> collector,
Reporter reporter)
throws IOException {
for (DeliveryLogEvent event : values) {
collector.collect(event);
}
}
}
I've also noticed that /tmp/mapred seems to fill up and doesn't automatically
get cleaned out.
Is Hadoop itself supposed to clean up those old temporary work files or do we
need a Cron job for that?
Thanks,
Frank Grimes
On 2012-01-06, at 3:56 PM, Joey Echeverria wrote:
> I would use a MapReduce job to merge them.
>
> -Joey
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Frank Grimes <frankgrime...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Joey,
>>
>> That's a very good suggestion and might suit us just fine.
>>
>> However, many of the files will be much smaller than the HDFS block size.
>> That could affect the performance of the MapReduce jobs, correct?
>> Also, from my understanding it would put more burden on the name node
>> (memory usage) than is necessary.
>>
>> Assuming we did want to combine the actual files... how would you suggest we
>> might go about it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Frank Grimes
>>
>>
>> On 2012-01-06, at 1:05 PM, Joey Echeverria wrote:
>>
>>> I would do it by staging the machine data into a temporary directory
>>> and then renaming the directory when it's been verified. So, data
>>> would be written into directories like this:
>>>
>>> 2012-01/02/00/stage/machine1.log.avro
>>> 2012-01/02/00/stage/machine2.log.avro
>>> 2012-01/02/00/stage/machine3.log.avro
>>>
>>> After verification, you'd rename the 2012-01/02/00/stage directory to
>>> 2012-01/02/00/done. Since renaming a directory in HDFS is an atomic
>>> operation, you get the guarantee the you're looking for without having
>>> to do extra IO. There shouldn't be a benefit to merging the individual
>>> files unless they're too small.
>>>
>>> -Joey
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Frank Grimes <frankgrime...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Bobby,
>>>>
>>>> Actually, the problem we're trying to solve is one of completeness.
>>>>
>>>> Say we have 3 machines generating log events and putting them to HDFS on an
>>>> hourly basis.
>>>> e.g.
>>>> 2012-01/01/00/machine1.log.avro
>>>> 2012-01/01/00/machine2.log.avro
>>>> 2012-01/01/00/machine3.log.avro
>>>>
>>>> Sometime after the hour, we would have a scheduled job verify that all the
>>>> expected machines' log files are present and complete in HDFS.
>>>>
>>>> Before launching MapReduce jobs for a given date range, we want to verify
>>>> that the job will run over complete data.
>>>> If not, the query would error out.
>>>>
>>>> We want our query/MapReduce layer to not need to be aware of logs at the
>>>> machine level, only the presence or not of an hour's worth of logs.
>>>>
>>>> We were thinking that after verifying all in individual log files for an
>>>> hour, they could be combined into 2012-01/01/00/log.avro.
>>>> The presence of 2012-01-01-00.log.avro would be all that needs to be
>>>> verified.
>>>>
>>>> However, we're new to both Avro and Hadoop so not sure of the most
>>>> efficient
>>>> (and reliable) way to accomplish this.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Frank Grimes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2012-01-06, at 11:46 AM, Robert Evans wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Frank,
>>>>
>>>> That depends on what you mean by combining. It sounds like you are trying
>>>> to
>>>> aggregate data from several days, which may involve doing a join so I would
>>>> say a MapReduce job is your best bet. If you are not going to do any
>>>> processing at all then why are you trying to combine them? Is there
>>>> something that requires them all to be part of a single file? MapReduce
>>>> processing should be able to handle reading in multiple files just as well
>>>> as reading in a single file.
>>>>
>>>> --Bobby Evans
>>>>
>>>> On 1/6/12 9:55 AM, "Frank Grimes" <frankgrime...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if there was an easy way to combing multiple .avro files
>>>> efficiently.
>>>> e.g. combining multiple hours of logs into a daily aggregate
>>>>
>>>> Note that our Avro schema might evolve to have new (nullable) fields added
>>>> but no fields will be removed.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to avoid needing to pull the data down for combining and
>>>> subsequent
>>>> "hadoop dfs -put".
>>>>
>>>> Would https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-222 be able to handle that
>>>> automatically?
>>>> FYI, the following seems to indicate that Avro files might be easily
>>>> combinable: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-127
>>>>
>>>> Or is an M/R job the best way to go for this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Frank Grimes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joseph Echeverria
>>> Cloudera, Inc.
>>> 443.305.9434
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Joseph Echeverria
> Cloudera, Inc.
> 443.305.9434
