anyone?
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Rita <rmorgan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have asked this question elsewhere and haven't gotten the answers. > Perhaps, I asked it the wrong way or forum. > > I have a 40+ node cluster and I would like to make sure the data node > scanning is aggressively done. I know 8192kb/sec is hard coded but was > wondering if there was a better way to keep checking the data node status. > > Also, is there a document/wiki/blog page which will explain blockScanner > report in detail, and what options are needed to tweak them? > > > > -- > --- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.-- > -- --- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.--
