I fully agree, and sorry for my long silence. As GNU Health targets (also) health facilities in resource-limited setting, we cannot expect any best practice triage nurse reception setup. More often than not, it will just be a clerk who acts as receptionist, and that perdonn should only have access to patient core data. Thanks a lot! Chris
-------- Original Message -------- From: Chris Zimmerman <[email protected]> Sent: May 29, 2015 7:53:23 AM GMT+07:00 To: Luis Falcon <[email protected]>, "Cédric Krier" <[email protected]>, "Christoph H. Larsen" <[email protected]>, Chris Zimmerman <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: [bug #35461] Privilege Separation for Patiet Registration Follow-up Comment #9, bug #35461 (project health): Hiya Luis! Sorry about late response, I've been traveling and the internet was expensive and heavily-restricted there. I think the recent commits to restrict all the gyneco, socio, and lifestyle fields from the frontdesk user by default should address the main concern. Previously, the default installation for the frontdesk user *was able* to see the patient medical history, specifically gyneco, socio, and lifestyle fields. That seemed unintended. Hehe. Regards, C PS: I did give the suggested solution (separate models) an attempt but the only relationship that makes sense is a 1-1 (somewhat ugly). You'd also have to redo the patient view considering the view-model restrictions. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?35461> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
