On 2015-12-23 10:43, Luis Falcon wrote: > > Tryton has a clean and reliable way to manage upgrade that works > > since 7 years. I don't see the point to not use it. > True. Completely agree and it's a great feature. > > That said, I still think that we need a way for a "run once" code for > Tryton upgrades. Otherwise, as time and new Tryton version goes on, > we'll end up with very large __register__ methods, and with an > increased risk of criteria that was not met before at that point in > time, could be met in the future, generating a big problem, and hard to > track.
The idea in Tryton is to removed the old migration once the series ended long time ago. We still did not do the job but I think 1.* series could be cleaned now. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpO_DXdwGkaM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
