Follow-up Comment #7, task #16399 (project health):
[comment #6 comment #6:]
> Great! I think "source" fits nicely :)
>
> One issue I see from "patient" is too vague in terms of the source. When we
say "patient", are we implying that the individual is both a human and someone
that exist on the patient DB?
>
> Would the terms "human" and "other" work as one entry?
The reason I use 'patient' is that we have patient field already,
and do not conside other thing :-)
using 'human' can works too :-)
>
> We need to distinguish the individual source from specimen / sample (eg,
liver biopsy, blood.. ). The test itself should have this information.
>
> Would the field source fit this purpose?
Sorry I do not understand this question, at the moment, source field only
used
when it is not patient/human.
>
> Agree to keep the model very simple for the task! :)
>
> Best
>
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?16399>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
