On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 01:50 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote: > See espec > dicussion section of chapter about study 3. also conclusion chapter, > maybe also disucssion section of chapter about study 2. think about > how to use a flowchart to answer some of the explanations of those > items > that did not live up to hypothesis
I re-read those parts just now. The discussion of comments is mostly confined to study #2. What I found in study #3 is a lot of discussion of the fine points of the statistics and associated guesswork about the cause of the inconsistent results. I did not find a proposal for the kind of flow-chart study which I want to do. -- If you are an American then support http://fairtax.org (Permanently replace 50,000+ pages of tax law with about 200 pages.)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Heartlogic-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/heartlogic-dev
