Hi OHL-ians
Interesting stuff here. I skimmed it and given how overwhelmed
I am now, it looks like this is more for idle curiosity. Still
the first one I printed out so that I can add it to my paper pile.
Nonethless, I am going to make a wiki page for "Background, Literature
Review, and Related Work" and this email will be the first addition.
To that wiki page, I will add this to do item...
ToDo-ContactTheseWebsitesAndMaybeAskToGetWebPointerToUs.
....Oh well, I guess I wont' be adding this to the wiki. The site
is down and this email will be lost in the void once sent. Someone,
please add it.
Bill
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:45:14 -0700
From: Rich Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Rob Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John F. Sowa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "West, Matthew R SIPC-OFD/321" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
SUO WG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: More meat for the ontological stew
Discussion has been so slow here, I thought it might be time to
drop a related, but novel, bit of meat into the stew.
John Sowa's well explained belief that there is no single ontology
that would be a "cover" for all ontologies (other than the nil ontology
that defines initial ontological structure), has motivated me to look
further into how individuals develop their own specific ontologies.
A while back, someone suggested that we investigate the psychological
topic of "self construction" in trying to work out ontologies and
models of language use. I got interested in this area, and started googling
up papers.
And more recently, Rob Freeman suggested that perhaps we need to
take a completely different approach to linguistics since the old approach
has been so nonproductive over so many decades.
Motivated by all of these pointers, I've found a few papers that could
relate to how individuals form their ontological beliefs. This might
set the pace for a new discussion on methods and models of
ontology formation from a more psychological viewpoint.
For a psychologically-motivated study of emotion using
computer models, simulations, interactive games, and
facial measurment, see
http://www.unige.ch/fapse/emotion/members/kaiser/rai4.htm
For seeing the huge extent of brain involvement in emotional
behaviors from a neurophysiological point of view, see
http://www.becomehealthynow.com/article/bodynervousadvanced/825
Below is an article about "Incorporating Emotions and Personality
in Artificial Intelligence Software"
http://www.kaaj.com/psych/ai.html
The PAD Emotion Model described in the paper above seems
especially interesting, and might be enlightening for more discussion
here.
Any thoughts, comments, conclusions?
Thanks,
Rich
_______________________________________________
Heartlogic-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/heartlogic-dev
