Definitely not "sekhar" since that is the semikhut form.
Even-Shoshan (2000 ed.) gives "sakhar va-'onesh" (with a KAMATS under the vav).
He quotes Ahad Ha-Am, 15 and Berdichevski, Sipurim 11.).
Ruth
Quoting Joan C Biella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Is it
|
| sakhar ve-'onesh
| sekhar ve-'onesh
| sakhar va-'onesh
|
| or something even different?
|
| The phrase "sekhar ve-'onesh" occurs several times in RLIN and in the
| LC database, but I can't find such a construction in my reference books.
| Better to use "sakhar ve-'onesh"?
|
| Joan
|
--
