Hi Heidi, You are correct with the Romanization. I believe that the sheva under the gimel would be ignored in this case per the HCM.
Haim From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-boun...@lists.osu.edu> On Behalf Of Heidi G Lerner via Heb-naco Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 2:59 PM To: heb-naco@lists.osu.edu Subject: [Heb-NACO] romanization question Hi all, The verb "מתאגדים" I believe that it would be romanized as: "mitagdim" as per RDA Hebraica The first and most easily definable of these categories is the sheṿa occurring between the second and third consonants of the plural forms of benoni (participles, nouns, etc. having the same vowel pattern) and other verb forms of the pa‘al/ḳal, pi‘el, and hitpa‘el binyanim (stems), including all sheṿas following consonants with dagesh ḥazaḳ Any agreement or disagreement would be greatly appreciated I look forward to hearing from those who agree and those who don't. Thanks, Heidi Heidi G. Lerner Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica Metadata Dept. Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 ph: 650-725-9953 fax: 650-725-1120 e-mail: ler...@stanford.edu<mailto:ler...@stanford.edu>
_______________________________________________ Heb-naco mailing list Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
