> I prefer Qt to STL - not only because I know it better, but also because of > the documentation. I haven't found an adequate documentation for STL yet, > sorry :-)
I suggested using STL strings and lists because you said you were having problems. To my way of thinking, Stroustrup's _The C++ Programming Language_ documents the STL very well. I've never needed anything else, except for the occasional look at the header files and the `libstdc++' documentation: http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/ > > As for the parser function - actually, I'm not using C++ parser functions > right now, and I don't want to. I suggested using C++ in the actions, not generating a C++ parser class. If you don't want to do the former, and you would be interested in another suggestion, it would be to use C-style strings (i.e., arrays of `char') and implement lists yourself, which isn't hard to do. Laurence _______________________________________________ Help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
