On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Frans Englich wrote: > On Saturday 11 February 2006 17:23, Joel E. Denny wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Frans Englich wrote: > > > > > > Ok, that would certainly be nice. Perhaps an option or switch(named > > > tokentypename, perhaps?) that adds a typedef with a specified name, and > > > > I see this as outside the scope of Bison. That is, Bison defines its > > symbol yytokentype. You can easily define your own symbols. > > Yeah, of course. It would be wrong to make Bison enter that area, my mistake.
No problem. Thanks for your email, which helps re-motivate removing those #define's. Joel _______________________________________________ Help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
