On Wed, 3 May 2006, Derek M Jones wrote: > Ok. It would be useful to add a warning to the documentation that > this kind of thing sometimes happens (at least for the moment).
Yes, I agree, but it's been an issue of finding time. > > Unfortunately, it seems like the most obvious solution will worsen the > > parser's time complexity. I'm exploring a more sophisticated solution, but > > I'm afraid it'll be a while before I return to it. > > I can parse + other not very complicated stuff all the .c files in > the gcc/postgresql/openafs/openmotif/netscape (original C version) > source trees in under 30 cpu seconds. Having this increased to 60 > seconds would not be a problem. I don't know yet what the penalty would be. > Would I be correct to say this subtree sharing would not occur if > the grammar was left recursive? Sorry, I don't follow. Joel _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison