On Fri, 19 May 2006, Satya Kiran wrote: > Sorry for a small digression, but are we moving toward implementing > probablistic CFGs in bison? or is my understanding very oblique.. > thanks!
So far, I think we're just talking about how a Bison user might implement this (and other things) himself using semantic actions, %merge, and perhaps a few new features. I like to keep features general and reusable as much as possible. Direct support for weighted grammars is far beyond my current interests. Maybe someone else on the list is interested. Joel _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
