On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Frans Englich wrote: > No, I don't have a need to put END in my grammar nor give it a semantic > value,
I can't think of a need either. The results look buggy with the current implementation, so maybe Bison should report an error for this usage. > but I need to signal it in my hand written tokenizer(and it is messy to cast > 0 to the yytokentype enum). I'm guessing this feature was originally intended for no more than just that (and giving the end token a user-friendly string alias). Thanks. Joel _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison