On Wednesday 01 November 2006 00:44, Joel E. Denny wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote: > > I think I'm seeing it your way at least as far as these mid-rule warnings > > are concerned. Looking at it from another angle, while it's probably ok > > to warn about potentially dangerous uses of Bison's original features > > (%destructor and associated unset/unused values), it's harder to justify > > warning about potentially valid uses of traditional Yacc features > > (mid-rule values used as $0 or $-n instead of $n). > > > > It may be best to leave the mid-rule warnings off by default but activate > > them with -W. I'll try to implement this soon unless I hear an argument > > otherwise. > > I'm thinking of committing the following. Any comments from anyone?
that would work for me. thanks Henrik _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
