Hans Aberg wrote:
Once upon the time, Bison had an informal support for the C-parser to be
compiled as C++, but this was dropped, being too difficult to maintain.
Instead, a separate C++ skeleton was developed.
So, for C++, it is best to use the C++ skeleton file.
I have a lot of C++ code in my .y file, and no problems. This is 1.875c
- has this support been dropped since then?
But then, I can't immediately see why any C++ support is required, as
long as you use the union/struct mechanism for passing data. My YYSTYPE
is a struct which contains reference-counted classes. Maybe this is the
confusion? Do you only need the C++ skeleton if your YYSTYPE is a real
C++ class?
BTW, you don't even need Satya's 'extern "C"' declarations if you're
using gcc; don't know about other compilers.
Evan
_______________________________________________
help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
