On 10 Jul 2007, at 19:21, Steve Murphy wrote:
One idea of using %union is to save space, so it would no longer apply with your definition, as the "union" takes up at least the size of its smallest member.
You mean, methinks, the size of its biggest member...?
Sure; sorry for the typo. Hans Aberg _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
