I've never used Bison++/Flex++, so I'm no use there. The C files are completely compatible with C++ and I've found unless you need multiple concurrent instances or thread safe, they work just fine. I just have my output files name with a .cpp and .hpp extensions.
Hope that helps... Matt On 8/1/07, Camille Caceres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you. > > I've downloaded Bison 2.3, and Flex 2.5.4 seems to install fine although I > still have some problems compiling. Can you answer my question about > Bison++/Flex++? I'd like to know if I should use those since I want to > produce C++ files. > > > On 8/1/07, Matt Cupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've used both 2.1 and 2.3 versions to create code I compile with > > Visual Studio .NET 2005 and gcc on Linux. I would assume that it > > should compile fine on 2003 as well. The GNU for Windows project > > hasn't updated their Bison to 2.3, but if you download Cygwin you can > > select Bison 2.3 and Flex 2.5.4 to be installed. > > > > Matt Cupp > > > > > > On 8/1/07, Camille Caceres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, I hope someone can help me with some information. I am using > > > Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003. Is there a specific version of Bison > that > > > is compatible with this? I think Bison 2.1 is the latest version but I'm > not > > > sure. I would also like to know what version of Flex I should be using. > I > > > want to produce C++ files, should I be using Bison++/Flex++ instead? _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison