On 30 Sep 2007, at 09:00, Joel E. Denny wrote:
If we start "parsing" namespace names, we will have a million
new questions to answer. What is the output of "::foo",
I figured the namespace name is meant to be relative to the global
namespace, so a leading "::" is implicit if not specified.
I am sure about that, too.
"foo::", etc.?
This seems like an error to me.
That is what it looks like to me too.
Other than that, isn't it just a matter of splitting on "::"? Am I
forgetting something?
I think so too: just strip the leading "::"; trailing "::" results in
error; and remaining
<name_1>::...::<name_k>
is implemented as a nested
namespace <name_1> {
...
namespace <name_k> {
...
}
...
}
Hans Aberg
_______________________________________________
help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
