>>> "MK" == Matthias Kramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> state 1 > 4 EXPRESSION: T_IDENTIFIER . '(' EXPRESSION ')' > 5 | T_IDENTIFIER . [$end, T_IDENTIFIER, ';', '(', ')', "++", > "--", '+', '-', '/'] > '(' shift, and go to state 5 > '(' [reduce using rule 5 (EXPRESSION)] > $default reduce using rule 5 (EXPRESSION) > Is there some way to tell bison to prefer shifting to reducing in this > case? Yes, sure. S/R is a conflict bw a rule (reduce) and a token (shift). Since you want the shift here, the token must have precedence over the rule (or both have the same precedence but right associativity). The rule is labeled by T_IDENTIFIER, so you can just state that %nonassoc T_IDENTIFIER %nonassoc '(' to get what you want, use use %prec to label the rule with some other precedence/associativity token. _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison