On 12 Dec 2008, at 15:14, sgaurelius wrote:
So, you re saying to do the first and add more errors as I find
more errors.
Yeah, I guess this is the optimal.
Since it goes deep until finding the first error, it will print
messages for
all errors or for the most basic one ? The latter is better I think.
It really depends on how detailed error recovery you want. Error
recovery was important in the days when one used punch cards, and it
might take days to get it run.
Today, when one is working interactively, it is efficient to just fix
the problems as soon as they appear.
You might want discussing this in the Usenet newsgroup comp.compilers.
Hans
_______________________________________________
help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison