oops! you're right. sorry for the trouble. Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 29, 2014, at 12:06 PM, Hans Aberg <haber...@telia.com> wrote: > > >>> On 29 Dec 2014, at 22:40, sean nakasone <seannakas...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> The placement of the ++ makes it a post increment, so it's incremented after >> the statement, so it should not affect the value of k. >> >> It's incrementing values in temp_map, but temp_map is deallocated after the >> for loop, so that's why I thought it wasn't doing anything. >> >> for (s = 0; s < nstates; ++s) >> { >> transitions *sp = states[s]->transitions; >> int i; >> for (i = sp->num - 1; i >= 0 && TRANSITION_IS_GOTO (sp, i); --i) >> { >> goto_number k = temp_map[TRANSITION_SYMBOL (sp, i) - ntokens]++; >> from_state[k] = s; >> to_state[k] = sp->states[i]->number; >> } >> } >> >> free (temp_map); > > It loops through the inner loop several times though, so the next time, the > value has changed. > > > > _______________________________________________ > help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison