On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 17:46 +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: > Hi Kip, Hey Akim,
> I would be very interested in knowing what features Bison++ > offers that Bison does not. Yes, you are right, Bison generated > C files first, and C++ was added later. Yet, the C++ skeletons > were designed, they are not just C code put into a C++ class. > > If you saw shortcomings in Bison’s C++ output, please let us > know, and we’ll see what we can do. It's actually been a while since I was working on my project's parser. As you may have noticed, my post was from about a year ago. Unfortunately it's been too long to recall any details, but if they come to mind I will let you know. PS I should also point out that bison++(1) and bisonc++(1) are different with the latter more recently maintained. -- Kip Warner | Senior Software Engineer OpenPGP signed/encrypted mail preferred https://www.thevertigo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
