On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 8:45 AM John P. Hartmann <jphartm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your concern is with managing such a large grammar, right? Yes. Mainly for testing. There is no law against splitting the larger productions into separate > files and use the C preprocessor before passing the file to Bison. You > would likely write skeleton grammars to process specific productions. > > Another tack is to #include [parts of] semantic large routines that do > not require expansion of $n or @n; or you could put those functions in a > separate file and #include that (my preference)--the compiler will know > when to inline those functions. Do you know where I can find some examples showing the above thing that you mentioned? Thanks. -- Regards, Peng _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
